We notice the Court of Appeal ruled a school could not deny a young girl access because of her dreadlocks. The court overturned a 2020 case that said the school had not breached the child’s constitutional rights. It’s a huge victory for Afro-centric Jamaicans who have long fought for their right to express their cultural heritage and religion through their appearance.
The ruling opens a broader conversation about cultural expression in schools. Afro-centric Jamaicans see dreadlocks not merely as a hairstyle but as a symbol of their heritage and identity. The decision is seen as a step forward in affirming the rights of individuals to express their cultural and religious beliefs without discrimination. Others are concerned there may be negative outcomes. National Parent-Teacher Association of Jamaica President Stewart Jacobs says the ruling could be used as an excuse to breach school policies. He advises parents not to use this as an opportunity for children to dress however they like.
Opposition Spokesperson on Culture and Creative Industries Dr. Deborah Hickling Gordon called the government’s actions hypocritical and manipulative, claiming they stand with the Rastafari community in some instances while taking away their rights in others.
“I am pleased with the outcome,” said Attorney Isat Buchanan, who represented the girl’s family, “and the recognition of human rights, in particular, freedom of expression and equitable treatment as it relates to dreadlocks, Rasta, and Afro identity in modern Jamaica.”
Many now expect parents and teachers to work together to ensure that while children are allowed free expression they also adhere to school policies and that religion, ethnicity, or heritage not be used as grounds for discrimination.